God and Social Structure

By BlogSpotThinker
October 16, 2011 01:36pm

Recommended strategies for achieving individual personal growth appear to include maximizing individual personal honesty and vulnerability regarding personal perspective.

These solutions appear to not take into account the apparently vast and weighty social structure that humanity has developed, apparently, as a tool to help facilitate humanity’s survival. Reports appear to suggest that this structure potentially destructively impacts humanity. Further, this vast, weighty, potentially destructive social structure appears to not necessarily assign the highest value to humanity.

An apparently reasonable theory appears to be that certain parts of this social structure appear to have been designed to not reward the vulnerability and honesty apparently recommended by these strategies. A possibly novel or less-commonly-presented, yet apparently reasonable theory appears to be that the social structure does not reward vulnerability and honesty because vulnerability and honesty appear to reveal that humanity’s knowledge and discernment are limited. Further, these human limitations appear to be reasonably considered to suggest the dramatically grave theory that humanity might not have the qualifications to assume full management of the human experience.

Apparently, human limitation has resulted in the human development of a social structure with construction errors that appear to be reasonably considered to render the outcomes of social structure implementation to be error-prone. Secular history’s reports of harm that humanity has suffered at humanity’s hand appear to be reasonably considered to support this premise. The strategy for survival and even prosperity in this apparently somewhat destructive, humanly-developed social structure appears to be to attempt to jostle oneself away from the destructive and, if necessary, to jostle others toward it.

As a result, honesty and vulnerability appear not to be respected, welcomed and reciprocally treated as they perhaps should be. Instead they appear to be viewed as indication of an opportunity for jostling toward the destructive aspects of humanly-developed social structure, somewhat like padding. Perhaps, this apparently reasonable theory reasonably offers additional explanation for apparent reluctance toward honesty and vulnerability.

I humbly and respectfully submit, as a believer in God, that the Bible appears to suggest that the true solution appears to be (a) voluntary individual recognition that there is a God, (b) voluntary individual acceptance of the premise that God is both the creator of humanity and the sovereign manager of each individual’s human experience, and (c) voluntary restoration of each individual relationship with God.

The Bible appears to suggest that this restored relationship with God is the key to the unpoisoning of human perspective that allows honesty and vulnerability to be valued as traits to be embraced, cherished, protected and reciprocated rather than destroyed.